I refer to the use of metaphor to indicate the propensity and the propensity for optimism to pessimism. In political debates this metaphor is used a lot by petulant Lupi, indicating that the government's action of doing brilliantly achieved at least half of the objectives with which it was submitted to the voters and those that highlight the goals they had missed the ' intellectual honesty to admit that at least half of these objectives had been successfully achieved, despite the considerable obstacles that had interposed along the path. The short political opponents saw only half of the glass half empty, ignoring the full. Staying in metaphor but looking at the glass from the perspective of citizens and not politicians, I would observe that not all glasses are equal: they are different in size, quality of the glass and, above all, for the liquid that is paid and then, predictably, been drinking. The glass of the rich or well-off can also be a multi-faceted glass, such as one for water, one for wine, another for the liquor, though they are all finely crafted, and the glass of the poor, mostly of mediocre quality, unique throughout the meal, completely missing for a break from meditation. On quality of the liquid goes from the Brunello di Montalcino wine idea, what division you can imagine. The amount of wine may be misleading, however, the rich or wealthy, never fill the glass almost to the edge, not an end, the poor almost fills to overflowing and quaff in one breath, aware that it can be His last drink. The rich have a well stocked wine cellar available, the poor barely a closet to store the worn-out tools. The Wolves on indulging too often quoted to appoint the theater of politics, where he will attempt to wire suspended puppet manipulated by a skilled puppeteer, hired by a more adroit master. Lupi said the award is considered a skillful puppeteer, which would be of immense horror operated.
0 comments:
Post a Comment