Is There A Uncensored Version Of School Spirit?

O eat this soup or jump out the window, ie: the meaning of very new vocabulary in the Conservative-liberal

Of all the comments in support of the line Marchionne by of journalists who pride themselves on being led by the head and not from the stomach into thinking and writing, one in particular struck me the courage, the originality, to the profound ability to see what the common thinking is not well- can see, that of having understood that a worker who voted "no" is a conservative.
What he wants to keep that opposes to massive investments to revive production of a company that is governed in the past on public financial support and now, finally decided to go forward only with his forces, with the intelligence of his hard work with managers and employees , especially that of workers employed on the assembly line. With what sense of irresponsibility of this worker "no" demands to retain all the breaks he generously bestowed, what are ten-minute breaks less, too "handsomely" compensated with 35 euro per month? What would it cost to go to the canteen at the end of round rather than half. What are these microscopic waivers in the face of wage increases that are already looming on the horizon bright?

And why is affected it is argued that the right to strike, even though the restrictions are only intended to nullify any effect the strike itself without breaking the law?

To those who say that a strike is not equivalent to an ineffective strike reaffirming that one can not claim to have "your cake and eat it too" must be content with a formal right not expect to become substantial.

Strictly speaking it is not the first time that the concept of liberal conservative is applied to employees. This concept has been and is still applied to workers who claim to have a pension with only 35 years of hard work, are even branded as enemies of the younger generation as it will adversely affect the present and the future. According to this approach the world of speculative finance, the exorbitant banks, business travelers would have no responsibility for the crisis, but it would be because of the conservatism of the class of employees who claimed to "save both ways" to demand to have both rights and work, without wanting to give up their privacy for sacrificing the public good, not nearly Minamata them that what they call a public good is instead sic et simpliciter excessive welfare of the ruling classes.

Riappropriamoci the vocabulary of the lower classes, we the conservative and reactionary who wants to maintain privileges and deny the legitimate aspirations of those who are losing even the few hard-and hard-won rights.